Monday, February 8, 2010

Of Super Bowl Ads, Risk, and Politics

What a game?

I thought there at the end that the Colts had put Brett Favre into the game to do his best Brett Favre impression. Instead, it was Peyton Manning throwing the game ending interception. Peyton Manning! That same immaculate and indescribably incredible son of New Orlean's own Archie Manning. Conspiracy?

But who knew Drew Brees was so damn good?

And who knew that the Super Bowl ads were going to be so terrible? But more on that later...

An onside kick to open the second half was, in hindsight of course, the most brilliant play in Super Bowl history. Had the outcome gone any differently, there'd be a bounty out for Sean Payton's head. Especially after that debacle of a play on 4th and goal just a few minutes earlier. Instead, that guy who coaches the Colts held a look of shocked disbelief on is face from that moment on. Indeed, I'm certain he is still wondering just what the hell happened. I mean, he had Peyton Manning under center!

Which brings up a good point: Risk.

Risk can lead to monumental success, or terrible failure. There cannot be one without the other. And so, men must take chances. In business, in sport, in love. How many of us would be married today had we not taken that absurdly self-aggrandizing step of asking a woman to dedicate the rest of her life to us? And how many of us would be married if that girl had not taken the even more ridiculous, and self-basing chance of actually agreeing to such a proposal?

Which is why the government is so terrible at Super Bowl ads. They have no skin in the game. That is, you and I paid for a bunch of Hollywierd lefties to pretend they were a part of the private sector inadvertently ripping off the Government. Imagine that, the private sector stealing from the government! Hahahahahhhhhaaaaaa! Ahem. Sorry. Where was I? Oh, yes. 2 million tax payer dollars were used to promote the census during the Super Bowl. The census. During the Super Bowl. 2 Million. Dollars.



By all means, give these people our health care!

But at least the ads were free of any draconian references to Nazi Germany, right? Except, were they?



Is this ad brilliant parody, or a glimpse into an algore future? Perhaps Both? It wasn't funny, if that was it's intent. But it did make the entire green cult look silly and petty. But then, I'm not sure if that was intended or not either. The take home message that conforming to totalitarianism is A-OK was a little puzzling. And will it sell any cars?

I suppose we will find out. (See above about taking risks)

Meanwhile "Who Dat" is fast becoming the most annoying phrase on the planet. But at least "pants on the ground" has been supplanted. And it would also appear that the damage inflicted on New Orleans from Hurricane Katrina will only be slightly worse than what is being predicted from the combination of Mardi Gras and a Super Bowl victory. I'm certain FEMA is warming up the school buses as we speak.

But don't worry. There is a light at the end of this dark wintery tunnel: pitchers and catchers report February 18th.

3 comments:

Zar February 8, 2010 11:45 AM  

At least two of us (poll) thought the Saints would win. And given how the Colts were moving the ball, I didn't disagree with the call (while it was still undetermined who got the ball). Their playcalling and defense (gives up lots of yards, but somehow scores 10 TDs) is about risk and making plays, even, as you said, failure sometimes results (the D gets moved on pretty easily, for example).

I also thought that green ad was horrible and at first thought it was a political message of some sort. The census ad? Those two ads, along with the 'let's spend 10 million to let everyone know that we're going to give away food (more marketing $) and piss off impatient people who are looking for a free meal' ad were horrible and the ad agencies should be sued for negligence.

Bitner February 8, 2010 3:27 PM  

Wow, those commercials were awful. And what was with all the commercials with dudes in underwear? Seemed like 3 or 4 different brands had that mixed into their ad...something weird going on at the ad agencies, fo sho.

Although, the one in the "casual dress friday" office was pretty funny.

Re: the game itself (oh yeah, the game.) I laughed at Phil Simms late in the game (before the pick-6) when he said, "you know, Jim, one thing you can say about this Saints team is they played their style tanight. win or lose, they played Saints football." I'm sure if they lost that game (having gone for it on 4th and goal, the onsides kick, etc) there would be doubters as to the 'style'.

Nevertheless, hats off to Payton for having the juevos to gamble as frequently and as monumentally as he did. Amazing. Just seemed like there was more at stake for Payton and the Saints.

Oh, and I'm glad somebody's keeping track of pitchers and catchers reporting.

Personally, I'm excited to be in Seattle all summer so I can see the M's in person.

Ryan P Giles February 10, 2010 3:44 AM  

Is that an announcement of sorts?

Congratulations!

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP