Showing newest 49 of 51 posts from March 2009. Show older posts
Showing newest 49 of 51 posts from March 2009. Show older posts

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The Collapse


Some of you have noticed my turn to the pessimistic view recently. The financial industry doesn't look good, and the problem that most people have yet to realize is that the financial industry isn't A component of our economy, it is the heart of our economy. Everything is tied to it. So here is how the coming collapse will manifest itself in the next months/years.


1. The S&P 500 goes to 300 as the "bailouts" and "handouts" collapse the economy.

2. The PBGC's equity investments are worth 20 cents on the dollar, the private equity and REITs are zeros. This puts the fund 40% underwater across-the-board.

3. It is unable to pay and goes to Congress.

4. Congress can't fund additional borrowing because the bond market has dislocated.

5. You get 10 cents on the dollar for your supposedly 'guaranteed' pension.

What we have in the background of this stock market is a powder keg that is lit and the fuse is almost burned out. Consider the exposure that corporate pension funds have to the stock market. When I flew out to General Mills for a job interview I was told that their pension was funded at 150% of the obligations. That was when the DOW was at 14,000. They are a fiscally responsible and very conservative organization. With limited pension obligations.

Think about the pensions owed by the auto makers, public employees, and pretty much every union in the country. People that have little understanding of the stock market other than that it returns 10% per year. The news is slowly trickling out that pensions are underfunded by a lot. This is a huge problem as the pension benefit guarantee organization, the government sponsored entity that insures pensions is having funding problems of their own.

Just months before the start of last year's stock market collapse, the federal agency that insures the retirement funds of 44 million Americans departed from its conservative investment strategy and decided to put much of its $64 billion insurance fund into stocks.

Switching from a heavy reliance on bonds, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation decided to pour billions of dollars into speculative investments such as stocks in emerging foreign markets, real estate, and private equity funds.

The agency refused to say how much of the new investment strategy has been implemented or how the fund has fared during the downturn. The agency would only say that its fund was down 6.5 percent - and all of its stock-related investments were down 23 percent - as of last Sept. 30, the end of its fiscal year. But that was before most of the recent stock market decline and just before the investment switch was scheduled to begin in earnest.


If one or two company pensions go under, they have the funds to save them. When a handful go under they will be stressed. When dozens go down at once, they have to turn to the government. The government is busy writing checks for other things and guess what, people are no longer buying up government debt like they used to. Last week we sold US treasuries to raise money and no one wanted them. China especially is tired of the rhetoric coming from Washington

They used to be our best customer.

Read more...

Monday, March 30, 2009

A Day with Mitt Romney

I had the great opportunity to spend Friday with former presidential candidate Mitt Romney. I was part of a small gathering of some of his campaign workers, contributors and supporters. We had lunch, talked strategy, and later watched NCAA tournament games at his home in Park City (he was rooting for MSU of course). In addition to getting to meet Governor Romney, I had a chance to meet several other neat people, from businessmen to politicians to Romney family members. It was a memorable day.

Needless to say, among so many ultra-successful people I felt a little out of my league. Alright, I felt totally out of my league. My league was not even invited to the dance, let alone the backstage party. So I smiled and nodded a lot, and tried to look as competent and professional as I can. I am not sure I fooled anyone.

But I did have the audacity to pull the Governor aside and talk a little policy with him. I shared my concerns and my thoughts about the state of the Union, and he graciously listened. But more important than what some hack blogger has to say to him, was what he had to say to us. And I learned something about Mitt Romney that I had previously not realized.

He is driven by policy. Sound, tested, policy.

He is type cast as an economic guru. And rightfully so. But his expertise goes far and beyond just running a corporation. He is very well versed in the international climate. He is very aware of the chess game that the nations of the world are playing right now. And he is very aware that the United States is in a precarious position in that game. He sees the economic thin ice that many nations, including the U.S. are walking on and knows that economic health is tied to military, social and cultural health. If you were to go back and read some of his campaign speeches, you'd see that many things he warned us about, are coming to pass right now.

I won't go into all the nitty-gritty of what he said. But I was impressed at how detailed he was in his ideas and his solutions for the problems that face us today. He did not stand up and say things like "I want to fight for America". He spoke in clear and lucid detail. I found it striking that though right now he has zero political capital, that he was still able to draw a powerful crowd around him. The people around him on Friday are some of the most influential people in their respective circles around the country. And they all look to him as an example and as a leader.

His plans for 2012?

Several people asked him about 2012. His answer was the same each time. "I am leaving that door open." So, he may run again. He may not. It is obvious that through is PAC he is trying to keep himself in the game. But he insisted that the circumstances would have to be ideal for him to once again, put his name in the hat.

Personally, I think the climate will be very good for him in 2012. He will enter the primary season as the most experienced, the most tested and the most well known of the potential GOP candidates. He learned a lot during 2008. And the mistakes he made (which he readily acknowledged and discussed) will be mistakes he won't make in 2012.

It was exciting to meet Governor Romney. I don't get weak-kneed over politicians or celebrities, but I was admittedly looking forward to shaking his hand, sharing a few of my ideas and listening to many of his.

Oh, and the caterer he hired from little Kamas, UT was one of the best I have ever seen.

Sadly, I did not get a chance to tell him about www.timetokeepscore.com

Read more...

Sunday, March 29, 2009

A little gallows humor


In The Know: Should The Government Stop Dumping Money Into A Giant Hole?

Read more...

Friday, March 27, 2009

Iraq: Arrested Development Style



For those that didn't watch this, shame on you. Now go to hulu.com and start watching from season 1 episode 1.

Read more...

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Life Imitates: The Office

Season 5, Episode 18, March 19, 2008:

Michael: I don't understand that after fifteen years of service here, I have to get in the car and drive to New York in order to talk to you. That doesn't seem right to me. That doesn't seem fair. And I think that I've earned more than that.
David: Yeah. You're right. Yes. I get it. I get it, Michael. Here's what I'm going to do-
Michael: Ok.
David: We will move some money around, and I will personally see to it that you have your party, you have your figs. I will be in attendance. It's gonna be great. How's that?
Michael: [gets up to shake David's hand] I quit.
David: What?
Michael: You have no idea how high I can fly.


AIG executive vice president, Jeff DeSantis, March 24, 2009 letter of resignation to AIG CEO Edward Liddy:

I take this action after 11 years of dedicated, honorable service to A.I.G. I can no longer effectively perform my duties in this dysfunctional environment, nor am I being paid to do so. Like you, I was asked to work for an annual salary of $1, and I agreed out of a sense of duty to the company and to the public officials who have come to its aid. Having now been let down by both, I can no longer justify spending 10, 12, 14 hours a day away from my family for the benefit of those who have let me down.


Actually, read the entire letter. I think it highlights a root problem of the perception that the public has of "Wall Street" right now. In many ways that perception is justified. But in many ways it is not. There are honest, hard working people who work in finance who are guiltless in this crisis. And frankly, those are the kind of people who will fix the problem. Not the blowhards on Capitol Hill. The faux-outrage coming from congressional leaders, including the president, is what really ought to be making us angry. It was they, after all, that enabled, mandated and funded the bonuses that AIG is being crucified for.

Season 3, episode 07:

Michael: All right, listen up. Some of you may have heard some rumors about the branch closing. But, I am not going to take this lying down. I have a plan and I am going to save our jobs. So just hang in there. [Looks at Dwight] Let's go.
Dwight: Yes!
Pam: Oh, good... you're bringing Dwight.
Michael: Yes. This might get ugly. I need backup.

Dwight: What's the plan?
Michael: Go to New York, confront the CFO, show him he's making a mistake... save the branch.
Dwight: Can I drive?
Michael: No... way.
Dwight: Shotgun!
Michael: No. There's no one else.
Dwight: Still.

Dwight: Thank you very much. [hangs up cell phone] Okay, secretary says Wallace is away for the day and won't be coming back into the office.
Michael: Okay, okay. Um...
Dwight: But, do not worry. I have his home address right [presses cell phone button] here.
Michael: Why?
Dwight: Christmas card list.
Michael: You sent him cards? You never met him.
Dwight: But when I do, we'll have something to talk about.


March 21, 2009, The Connecticut Working Families Party, funded by ACORN, arranges bus tours to the homes of AIG executives. Why? To heckle and hoot and protest of course. For ACORN and the left (but I repeat myself) the private lives of private citizens is not something worth respecting when those private citizens are wealthy. Or conservative (see; the Plumber, Joe).

Oh, and while President Obama and Barney Frank were wagging fingers at AIG, the House passed a bill that will require the people of America to serve the government. The Act seeks to find out:

...Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.


Mandatory volunteerism?

Dwight: I didn't know that you were at a party on Saturday night.
Ryan: I go to a lot of parties.
Dwight: Okay, I'm gonna need to search your car. Give me you keys.
Ryan: I am not giving you my keys.
Dwight: Don't make me do this the hard way.
Ryan: What's the hard way?
Dwight: I go down to the police station on my lunch break. I tell a police officer, I know several, what I suspect you may have in your car. He requests a hearing from a judge and obtains a search warrant, once he has said warrant, he will drive over here, and make you give him the keys to your car, and you will have to obey him.
Ryan: Yeah, let's do it that way.
Michael: Ry, is he bugging you? Dwight, dude, you gotta take a chill pill, man. It was one joint in the parking lot. You know, you're totally harshing the office mellow.
Dwight: I can't stop this investigation. It is my job.
Jim: Whoa. You are a volunteer.
Dwight: I volunteered for this job.
Jim: And that's not the same.
Dwight: It is my duty...
Jim: [interrupting] Volunteer duty.

Read more...

Sweet 16 Primer


NCAA Expands March Madness To Include 4,096 Teams

Thanks to Zar for passing this along.

Read more...

The Devalued Prime Minister



Daniel Hannan, a member of the British Parliament takes P.M. Gordon Brown to task. Absolutey destroying his credibility in one, fantastically searing tirade against the terrible spending practices of the liberal Prime Minister.

Where are people like this in the U.S. Congress? Will anyone stand up and speak to President Obama like this? I'd love to see it. And he needs to hear it.

Read more...

Homeland Defense!

I'm filling out my emigration stuff in order to move to the UK. One of the forms has some very tough questions.


Have you ever been involved in‚ supported‚ or encouraged terrorist activities in any country? Have you‚ ever been a member of‚ or given support to an organisation that has been concerned in terrorism?

Have you ever‚ by any means or medium‚ expressed views that justify or glorify terrorist violence or that may encourage others to terrorist acts or other serious criminal acts?


I really wonder how effective those questions can be. Are they as good at ferreting out bad guys as the "Have you had your luggage with you at all times?" I question the value.

Read more...

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Reagan was Quick

Read more...

Recessionary Fallout

One of the fun consequences of a recession is that it provides a good go-to joke when you're in a bind. The words, "We're in a recession," if said with the right amount of sarcasm, make for good times. Like when the Controller walks in with a couple boxes of donuts on a Friday and you deadpan, "Dude...we're in a recession."

But there are several more important consequences of a recession. I list just a few here:

  • Credit ratings matter more. If you want to lease a condo or buy a car or put that xbox on layaway, your credit rating matters more in times like these.
  • Savings accounts swell. Cash is the new monarch in America, not Obama. For the most part, people have money, but they're tentative in spending it so they just hold it. Waiting.
  • Customer service is an order of magnitude better than usual. The other day I walked into a grocery store in Seattle and was given instant assistance in finding the perfect breakfast sausage. It was as if I was in a different era. Customer service is BACK! For now.
  • Education is all the rage. I've chronicled a bit on this blog about my intentions to get my MBA. I'm one of tens of thousands heading back to school. Recessions do that to people.
  • Governments get creative with managing tax revenues. Look no further than Congress trying to levy a 90% tax on bonuses at companies receiving federal bailout money.

In connection with that last point, my favorite recessionary consequence thus far is that Delaware (and now New Jersey) is trying to raise tax revenues by legalizing sports gambling.



LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLET'S GET READY TO GAMBLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLE!!!

Read more...

Teleprompter fun

This past week Barack's teleprompter has gotten a lot of attention. Apparently he has started a blog. This entry was particularly amusing so I"ll pass it along.

I warned Big Guy not to buy Bill Clinton's old address book as part of the Hillary-to-State deal, but does he listen? Now I have this mess to clean up.

All of us here at the White House read French, so for those of you who can't, the article says that Big Guy accidentally sent an official letter of greeting to former French President Jacques Chirac, instead of to current President Nicolas Sarkozy. Guess that explains why the letter to former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder showed up undeliverable the other day.

Now you know why we seemed so unprepared for our meeting two weeks ago with Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Great Britain. We were expecting Tony Blair, and had all this really cool personalized stuff for him, but we couldn't very well give those gifts to Brown. It would've been rude, so we just gave him crap from the Smithsonian gift shop.

Big Guy is really ticked about this latest embarrassment, particularly since even President George W. Bush didn't make these kinds of mistakes. He swears he's going to repair all the damage next month when he goes to the G-7 meeting in London, where he says he plans to also have a long talk with Chairman of the Supreme Soviet Mikhail Gorbachev about re-starting START talks.

Read more...

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

My Way or the Highway

Noway could I say it any better than this:

There are other indications that last week's fury may be calming. The Wall Street Journal reports that "over the weekend, the White House worked to tone down its Wall Street bashing and to win support from top bankers for the bailout plan announced Monday." It seems the administration "has concluded that it needs the private sector to play a central role in fixing the economy." Brilliant, guys. We could have told you that.

Problem: "Weeks of searing criticism by politicians and the public had left bankers leery of working with the government." Isn't Obama among those who spent years arguing that President Bush's arrogant my-way-or-the-highway attitude toward foreign policy harmed America by alienating friend and foe alike? Whatever you think of that insight, did it not occur to the new president that it might have some applicability in domestic politics?

Read more...

Monday, March 23, 2009

Are You Punch Drunk?

Read more...

The Bushisms of Obama

PARIS - Just 2 months into his presidency, George W. Bush sent a letter to the president of France. It was a heart felt outreaching of friendship and harmony, a chance to put old differences aside and "reset" the relationship between two old allies.

The only problem?

He sent the letter to the former French president, Francois Mitterrand. A man who had not been president for over 6 years. "I am flattered, but I fear, irrelevant at this point in time" Mitterrand lamented.

In response to the gaffe, current French president Jacques Chirac was reported to have said, "Tell Mr. Bush that I would be happy to set up a meeting for him with Mr. Gorbachev. Perhaps he will insist that the Soviet Union 'tear down that wall'?"

In hopes of soothing the offended French leader, President Bush sent the man a set of 25 American classic movies. However, it was reported that the DVDs were encoded for North American players and so did not work at the home of President Chirac.

"I can't be surprised" grumbled Chirac, "the man is a buffoon."

When alerted that his gift had backfired on him, Bush joked that his presidency was "kicking off like the Special Olympics." The comment drew outrage from the Shriver family and the president was forced to apologize.

"Golly, I am having a terrible week. I mean, hell, not even those executives at Enron are having it as bad as me. And those punks are worse than suicide bombers!"

When pressed for clarification Bush laughed a giddy and unhinged laugh, stating that "in these tough times a little gallows humor is all we got to get us through!"

Read more...

A Quick Thought on Greed

When the economy became the hot topic during the last campaign, both parties were cursing the “greed on Wall Street”. Yeah, those blasted greedy executives sitting in lofty office buildings that dot the financial district of New York City are all a bunch of evil, conspiring, dirty rotten scoundrels. Baloney.

We live in capitalist society that moves and operates on the collective effort of men and women who are out to seek their best interests. Suppliers supply in accordance with what is most profitable, and demanders demand in accordance with what is most useful. That function of supply and demand drives the market. Every one wants to find someone to blame this economic mess on and it’s easy to curse the guys from the big buildings in NYC.

Americans wanted houses. They got mortgages to get those houses. Period. The market did that. No one forced mortgages on anyone. Investors wanted a piece of this mortgage puzzle as part of their portfolio. They got in the form of CDOs. The market did that. No one forced anyone to invest in a CDO.

Capitalism has become the whipping boy during this economic melt down we’re wading through. But the fact remains that no other system has made a nation more productive or created more wealth for its citizens than a capitalist society. I found this gem from Milton Friedman:

Read more...

Sunday, March 22, 2009

White house garden



Michelle Obama is filling her role as first lady nicely thus far by picking up several non-controversial pet projects that don't cost a lot and keep everyone happy. One of the novel and seemingly innocuous projects is planting a vegetable garden in her new backyard. She had some poor-looking kids from a Washington public school helping her pull weeds for a photo-op last week.

This symbol of self sufficiency and good health may seem harmless.

But don't be surprised when her husband comes out next week talking about student loan-forgiveness programs in exchange for squash and tomatoes. And don't be surprised when you are forced to have a garden or pay exorbitant taxes in coming years.

This emergency preparedness hogwash wreaks of provincial protectionism and is just another ploy to get us all to eat healthier, be happier and spend time as families and friends against our will!

Read more...

The Dick Cheney Card

Due to popular demand, and the promise of economic prosperity, I created what is sure to be a best seller among the right wing neocon crowd. At only $4.99 a card the Dick Cheney 'Threatening Lecture' series is a steal! Inside every pack is a chance to win an exclusive hunting trip with the former V.P.*

*Safety not guaranteed.

The card collections of innocent, ordinary, hard working Americans will be monitored via unauthorized, Orwellian wiretapping. Anyone who is found not to be collecting enough Cheney cards will be arrested, waterboarded, tortured and sent to GITMO where they will be humiliated, insulted, waterboarded again, and have their religion mocked.

On the back of every card is a puzzle piece, collect and assemble them all to find out the TRUTH behind the 9-11 attacks!




BUY NOW!

Read more...

Friday, March 20, 2009

Why I Love Bill James





While right now my sports focus is on the NCAA basketball tournament (something that Bill James loves), I can't help but be excited that the MLB Opening Day is right around the corner. Of course, baseball has some serious issues right now. Steroids dominate the headlines and threaten the integrity of the game. But don't think that football and basketball are not going to have their day in front of a finger-wagging congressional panel. They will.

But that is not my point.

No, my point is that despite the problems with baseball it still remains the game most influenced by statistical analysis. There is simply no other sport that measures up to baseball when it comes to evaluating a players actual ability (see; Moneyball). Claims of "clutch" can be checked against very detailed data, so-called "intangibles" can be scientifically evaluated. And the real worth of a player can be determined to the point that people at places like Baseball Prospectus can reliably predict how a player or a team will perform in the upcoming season.

But on to Bill James. I love his writing style. He can be a grumpy curmudgeon at times, he lets his own personal ideology get in the way of sound analysis once in a while and he believes that anyone who disagrees with him is an ignorant blowhard.

But my favorite part about his work are the observations that he makes. He is able to cull fairly significant and very interesting conclusions from otherwise mundane data. A fantastic read is his Historical Baseball Abstract in which he wrote pages about thousands of individual players.

Here is an example of some current observations he had about the 2008 season, excerpted from his 2009 Baseball Gold Mine:

Four of the very best players in baseball in 2008 weren’t serious contenders for the MVP Award or the Cy Young Award, because they split their seasons between the two leagues.

CC Sabathia, 17-10 with 251 strikeouts and a 2.70 ERA, didn’t win the Cy Young Award in either league because he made 18 starts in one league and 17 in the other.

Mark Teixeira hit .308 with 33 homers, 97 walks, 121 RBI, 41 doubles and eye-popping glove work at first base, but wasn’t a serious MVP candidate in either league because he split his time between the leagues.

Manny Ramirez hit .332 with 37 homers, 121 RBI (same as Teixeira), 87 walks and a .600 slugging percentage, but he, too, had one foot in each league.

And Jason Bay, while no one seems to have anything to say about him except that he is no Manny Ramirez, hit .286 with 35 doubles, 31 homers, 101 RBI, 111 runs scored, 81 walks, and 10-for-10 base stealing. A lot of guys have won MVP Awards doing less, but Bay, again, was a half-and-half.

Here’s a question for you: In all of baseball history up to 2007, are there four players that good who were out of the awards picture for either league because they split their duty between the leagues? I’m not sure there are. I know for certain that if you took all of baseball history up until about 1990, you couldn’t find four guys like that.

These split seasons have become more common in recent years, of course, because cross-league deadline trades have come into the game. Carlos Beltran in 2004 had a monster two-league season (38 homers, 42 stolen bases), and Randy Johnson in 1998 struck out 329 batters in the two leagues. Still. . .four in one season is, I am pretty sure, unprecedented.

Do we need an award for these guys? They’re MVP candidates, after all; they merely need legal standing. Are there going to be four of these guys every year, from now on, or was it a one-year aberration?

I don’t know. I just hadn’t heard anybody talk about it, so I thought I would.


And that is why I love Bill James. Because he thinks about and talks about stuff nobody else does.

Read more...

Bush Trading Cards

I ran to my local Wal-Mart to find these Obama trading cards that Adam blogged about but as Ohio is now a blue state, they are actually out of stock unlike the Utah Wal-Marts. Darn! But I did find some awesome Bush trading cards. Here is one of my favs:

The Front:


The Back:

Read more...

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Obama Trading Cards

No trip to Wal-Mart is complete without browsing the baseball card section. Often times I will find a box of repacks for $5 or random singles for 25 cents a pack. I can't resist buying up the older stuff. Sealed packs from the 1980s are still easily found and are generally dirt cheap. Recently I pulled Randy Johnson's rookie card from a repack box that cost me $8. I think there were 200 cards in the box.

Anyway, today I wandered through the aisle and there between the 2009 Topps Series 1 boxes was something I found all together mind boggling:



That's right. Barack Obama Trading Cards. This is just bizarre. Never mind the infatuation you'd have to have with the president to actually collect these, that doesn't really surprise me anymore. What I find odd is that these would be utterly boring to collect and trade. I can see it now:

Kid: I will give you the 2004 DNC speech for the '08 Presidential nomination speech.

Other kid: Dude. Are you joking? The nomination speech had pillars man, pillars!

Kid: Yeah, yeah OK fine, good point. How about the Race Relations speech for the 'I screwed up' press conference?

Other kid: Throw in the Joe the Plumber encounter and you gotta deal.

Kid: Done.


In addition to the box there were single packs. I was sorely tempted to pick one up just to see what they actually entailed. Do they have his stats on the back? Or maybe inspirational quotes? (But all his quotes are inspirational). I was nearly ready to toss the single casually on the conveyor belt, but then I noticed the price. $2. For like 7 cards. Which is typical of new release sports cards, and is why I usually stick to the old repacks from the 1980s and 90s.

And yet...

My curiosity just might get the best of me next time I am at the Wal-Mart.

Read more...

Bitner's Bracketology

Heaven help me. I love this time of year. Late March is a blessed time of year. 3 weeks of basketball madness followed by Opening Day of Baseball, followed by the Masters. I mean this is good times. Well I can't help myself with the madness. I am in an office pool. A family pool. A big friends pool. A pool with the blog authors (all friends as well, didn't mean to qualify it). And now, thanks to Sam, a faceoff with my wife. So that's 5 contests. That's almost as bad as the one year I had 6 fantasy football teams. (Never going back to 6 fantasy football teams, btw. That's just dumb.)

But here's the thing:

It's all one bracket, baby. I'm all in.

This isn't an investment deal. This isn't my 401(k). There is no hedging my bet here.

Fact is, I think that strategy of bracket hedging is lame. You got guys who fill out a dozen (or dozens of) brackets and each one is different and when they come out the winner in one they claim brilliance for picking the final four. Um, dude, you had 12 iterations of the final four. One was right. Congrats to you. 1 for 12.

No. Not me.

I got all my eggs in one basket. If I fizzle in one pool, I'm goin' down in all of them. Conversely, if I nail the final four, I'm potentially in the catbird seat in all my pools. It's the thrill of victory or the agony of defeat. Watching these games is supposed to be thrilling. By hedging my bets and filling out 5 or 10 or 100 different brackets (for you ESPN Tourney Challenge nerds), I remove the thrill of the games -- being happy for the results no matter what happens. Lame. Boring. Unfun.

I say 1 bracket per person.

Read more...

Reading is forever changed



Recently my wife purchased for me the Kindle 2 from Amazon. I'm sure you've heard reviews or seen pictures of them on the web. Let me tell you, from a trusted source, that the Kindle 2 has been a life changing product.

Previous to the Kindle I struggled with my reading. I always enjoyed reading, but it was difficult to fit it in between my other hobbies/interests/family needs. I'd slowly plod through books pages at a time as they stacked on my bedside table. During Christmas break I'd get more reading done then the whole year combined largely because of traveling and the increased down time. That has all changed with the Kindle.

In the past 3 weeks I have read A World Undone, Founding Brothers, Predictably Irrational, and I'm now currently reading Cheney. These books have had a tremendous impact already in my everyday thought. A few examples.

From Founding Brothers: Adams was the last nonpartisan President and tried to follow the model of Washington. A President should do what is in the best interests of the country, not be the leader of his party. Jefferson refused to be involved in the Adams cabinet as his VP and instead led the opposition, as the VP.

From Predictably Irrational: People cheat, but only a little. In a simple experiment MIT students were asked to answer 15 questions, for every question they got right they received a monetary reward. On average they answered 3.6 correctly. When given the chance to cheat without being caught they answered 6 correctly on average. However when asked to list all the 10 commandments they knew prior to taking the test they did not cheat and averaged 3.6 correct answers. There is value to reminding yourself of your ethical anchor at the start of the day.

From Cheney: He was raised in a democratic family, was a member of a union, and only by chance started out as an intern for a Republican. The other intern had chosen the Democrat to work for. He largely kept his democratic leanings to himself and they didn't change much until he served on Nixon's staff and was trying to implement government programs. He kept noticing that whenever the government tried to intervene there were loads of unforeseen consequences that usually ended up making the situation far worse. He was in charge of price and wage controls. Man I'm glad I didn't live in the 70s.

Ok so a coworker just looked at my Kindle and asked what I'm currently reading. I told her "Cheney" and she looked a little shocked. I then related the same interesting tidbit to her. Her response? "Does it also tell about how evil he is?"

Ahhh, informed political dialogue. I love NYC.

Read more...

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

March Madness and Marriage


Thought I'd share something that has done wonders for my marriage in the last couple weeks of March every year. I'm not that big of a sports fan. I like to play sports. I like to watch big championship games. And March Madness is the best of all.

But that fact that I'm not a big sports fan has the potential to be an obstacle for me in March because I haven't set the precedent throughout the year of doing fantasy leagues, reading SI or being a 'sports guy.' So when I sit down on the couch for two days straight for the first two rounds of the tourney I am likely to hear stuff like, "what are you doing? You don't even watch sports. At least fold some laundry!"

Or, toward the end of the second round...

"You are so lame. Who are you trying to impress? Go watch it at so-and-so's house."

Until a few years ago when I wised up and started to involve her in the epic of epic tournaments... By simply throwing down a friendly wager with my wife of, say $50 to $100 shopping spree for the best bracket,* all of the sudden she is popping popcorn for the big game and calling at lunch to see if I saw the last minute of the Louisville game...

It has become something we both look forward to every year. So print off a bracket, tell your wife what the little number means next to each team and don't ever feel guilty again about enjoying the tournament.

*Hint: This tactic works much better if she beats you

Read more...

Monday, March 16, 2009

The What Street Journal

What is happening to The Wall Street Journal? I mean, the WSJ is practically holy writ for many of the authors on this blog, and for any businessperson worth said person's salt. And yet, The Journal is morphing into the everyman paper.

News Corp is officially moving The Journal's newsroom operations to Midtown -- several miles from the Financial Center of the world.

Later this year, The Journal will publish a magazine devoted to the lifestyles and pursuits of the affluent.

And most recently, as you may have noticed, there is a major push to be a player in sports news/business. The Journal covering sports. Sounds like blasphemy to me. I couldn't help but scoff yesterday as I sat on a plane being de-iced in Seattle (you read that correctly -- Al Gore is full of crap, btw) and noted the following headline on my mobile WSJ: "NCAA Basketball Coverage: Track Duke Game on Live Blog." Pfft. Ridiculous.

So pretty soon, there will be a full-on sports section in the Wall Street Journal. The paper is now both literally and figuratively moving away from its core competency: business and finance.

I just find this a very daring move with brand dilution being the most likely outcome. The brand is the most valuable thing you have. You kill that, you eventually lose it all. At a time when newspapers are already under duress, this move appears especially desperate.

Read more...

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Stats and Sports

Here's an interesting follow-up to our debate about BCW a couple weeks ago: you don't need stats to know who's great. It's a really fun read from Bill Simmons in ESPN The Magazine.

Sports offer us the chance to obsess about stats and give us myriad ways to assess players. Before Bill James, before Moneyball, I knew numbers mattered. Jim Rice batted .315 with 46 HRs, 139 RBIs and 406 total bases in 1978. I have those numbers at my fingertips. As a boy, I stared at the back of his baseball card, marveling at that incredible season. It validated his greatness for me. There is a reason Ted Williams' .406 endures; Wilt's 100 and Gretzky's 215 too. Statistics allow us to compare players with one another, follow their peaks and valleys, determine which are most responsible for their team's success.

Hollywood doesn't work like that. It's an industry of extremes -- this movie had the biggest opening weekend, this guy made the most money, this woman used to be terrific until she went crazy -- that hinges on what everyone believes, not on what can be proved. I don't need to kill myself to get you to see that Nicholson is phenomenal. You already know. At some point in his career he broke into the greatest actors club, the membership of which we have all subconsciously agreed upon. We know who the best actors are. We just do. It's why Hollywood has never built a Hall of Fame. We don't need it.


So it is in sports. Or at least that's what Simmons argues. Stats help in the arguing the minutiae between two players of similar quality (Pujols vs. Manny) but you don't need stats to know who's great and who's not. Wade, Kobe, LeBron, Pedro, Manny, Papi, Manning, Brady...they're all great. You don't need stats to prove it. (Nor do the stats help assess an athlete's BCW-ness.)

Simmons throws a real wrench in his point, however, because of this conclusion:

So what does this have to do with sports? With everyone fretting about the steroids era and how it frayed the carefully woven fabric of baseball history, ask yourself this: Does any of it matter? Bonds remains the best leftfielder I've ever seen in person. I'll never forget watching Roger Clemens in his prime. I never turned the channel when Manny was batting for the Red Sox -- never, ever, ever, not once. A-Rod fetched the highest price in each of my fantasy auctions this decade. I probably paid four grand to Fenway scalpers from 1999 to 2001 to watch Pedro pitch even though I was broke. Some of them cheated for an edge they didn't need; others stayed clean. I will remember them all.

Maybe we overthink this stuff. The truth is, either you're great or you're not.

Anytime you bring up stats and roids, it's really only an issue for baseball fans/analysts, and most of them get their undies in a wad because they're so perterbed about the purity (or lack thereof) of the sport/statistics. But no matter your reaction to a known cheater, guaranteed you'll remember them. And most likely, you tuned in and watched them in their athletic prime, however enhanced that prime was.

Read more...

Hmm, that's odd more unintended consequences on the way

According to past evidence, the moves by Obama will actually DECREASE scientific discovery and the application of said discoveries.

The achievements of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) are monumental. But its efforts only translate into practical benefits for patients if its scientific research can be turned into new medicines, something that's not part of the agency's mandate. By its own recent count, the NIH cites only 84 examples over the last 60 years where the agency -- or academic institutions it supports -- discovered, let alone developed, a new drug or biologic.

Making new medicines is the work of a robust private life-science industry. In the case of stem cells, there are more than 150 private companies trying to turn stem cells into new treatments. But almost all of the companies pursuing this sort of chancy science are small biotechnology companies -- the kind that rely on private venture capital in order to fund their high-risk and expensive endeavors.

That capital may well start shifting to other enterprises as the Obama administration unveils policies that diminish the incentives to invest in new medical products. There's precedent for the availability of this sort of capital to turn on a proverbial dime. Shortly after President Bill Clinton unveiled his proposal for nationalizing the health-insurance market in the 1990s (with similar limits on access to medical care as in the Obama plan), biotech venture capital fell by more than a third in a single year, and the value of biotech stocks fell 40%. It took three years for the "Biocentury" stock index to recover. Not surprisingly, many companies went out of business.


Looks like "Science's" shot was blocked and this one went in favor of form over substance.

Read more...

Friday, March 13, 2009

There's No Easy Way to Say This...

...but college basketball sucks. There. I said it. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. College basketball does not compare on any level to the professional game. I hate it. I get a certain degree of enjoyment (although it might even be too much to call it "enjoyment." It's a strange fascination, really) out of watching female office mates who otherwise have no interest in sports win money or prizes in office bracket competitions and hearing about the latest 16 seed to get beat, but generally, I hate it.

Every day that I commute or work out, I spend a lot of time with headphones on listening to podcasts of my preferred radio and sports personalities, and I dread March because I have to lose half my podcast skipping through Bob Knight's take, or Dickie V (Admit it. He's annoying, baby.)

I recognize that I'm not just in a minority here. To most people, I'm flat out weird and perhaps un-American. When football season is in its waning weeks and the ticker starts to show scores like UNC(1) 116 UNCA 48, I realize that the sinking feeling in my stomach is one of butterflies for most.

I will concede one thing and one thing only, and that is that the energy of the players for the full duration of the game is higher in your average college game than anything but the playoffs or the last 5 minutes of an NBA game can offer. (After all, it does generally take a lot of energy to brick that many putbacks in the paint, particularly when you're six-foot-six and playing in the 5 spot.) And I will concede that the energy in the average arena of a college game is a wondrous fan experience.

But I'll still maintain that the professional game is better, and there are two main reasons. Number one, the talent level in the professional game makes for a much better experience for the basketball aficionado. Let me give you an example. The average breakdown for a good college game goes something like this: "The Tarheels really dominated tonight. That Tyler Hansbrough is a monster. I mean, he's just freakish. I'll tell you what, he had just a fantastic night."

Now, the average breakdown for a good NBA game goes something like this: "They were really able to exploit the matchup problems in the 3 spot tonight...," or "There was really no answer for the high screen tonight," or "The role players really answered tonight when LeBron's shot was off."

See the difference? In the pro game, there's something to break down. There's something to analyze. The college game revolves around which phenom is hottest any given year. They run fast and they hustle, but generally, they're just not that good.

If a team gets lucky, they'll be able to cobble together a few very good players (under 6-foot-6, most likely) who might have one year as a unit to make a run deep into the tournament. Then they're gone. Which brings me to reason number two why the pro game is far superior to the college game: continuity.

Yes, I know, I know, you'll tell me that it's great to watch egomaniac coaches manage to have some degree of success over time. Aren't they usually just the finest role models, too? I still say that's rubbish. You get no opportunity to watch the players and the organizations truly evolve in the college game. It's a crap shoot as to what kind of talent a school will get, whether the blue chippers will turn out, whether they'll actually work on defense, and how long you'll have them together.

Whereas in the pro game, you can watch a LeBron evolve. Every summer we are left to wonder what aspect of his game he's going to develop. When Jordan lost his ability to elevate quite as well, we got to see him put together a fantastic post game with an enhanced ability to score with his back to the basket. Kobe played all the way to the finals, played in the Olympics, and still found time to figure out that wacky little spin move he's using.

If the Armchair GM game tickles your fancy, you've got all kinds of drama in the pro game to figure out how to get the right package of players together to work best with your stars. And yes, you can actually make trades and stuff in the NBA. If coaching and strategy is your thing, you've got the wonder of trying to figure out whether the Suns are still salvageable in a post-D'Antoni world.

In short, the college game has a lot of appeal. If you only get a chance to go to one sporting event during the winter and you're not that intense of a sports fan, go watch a college game. Sit as close as you can to the student section, wear the team's colors, and go nuts. Maybe you can help put that layup in. But if you're a sports fan with any degree of intensity and want to follow teams through thick and thin with any degree of analytical-mindedness, there's really no option. You gotta watch the pro game.

Read more...

So When Does McCain Get Into the Club?

Apparently, the cool thing to do when you lose a presidential election is become really, really concerned about global warming. I've been seeing Senator Kerry quotes about global warming issues a lot lately. Maybe he's gunning for Al Gore status.

The question is, do they invite Senator McCain to join? Is there a place where they all go eat lunch and talk about how awkward it is to be an ex-presidential candidate? Is Al Gore like their hero since he managed to sort of transcend politics and become some kind of guru?

Read more...

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Troops

Read more...

Quote for Today

"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."

~Generally attributed to Margaret Thatcher

Read more...

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

More Science

I thought all this talk of science warranted some real insight into the issue, something that hit at the heart of the dilemma:

Read more...

The Cloak of Science



For years people of faith have been criticized for cloaking all their arguments with the phrase "Thus saith the Lord". That is the ultimate trump card for someone that believes in supreme deity. How can you possibly have a rational discussion with someone when all they have to do is declare, "God made it that way," or "God says so."

It turns out that people of faith no longer have a corner on that market. I find it infinitely entertaining the speed at which some have adopted the cloak of "Thus saith Science" to cover all their arguments and positions. As if "Science" has ever been at a steady state at any point in history. When Galileo discussed his thoughts about the Earth revolving around the Sun, "Science" was in opposition to him. When Einstein began challenging the theories of Newton, do you think he cared that "Science" opposed him?

Now it turns out that "Science" is able to shut off entire areas of discussion because they have been established and proven. Witness what happens to anyone that tries to discuss Intelligent Design in an academic setting. Also look at how establishment attempts to squelch anyone that tries to speak out against the cascading Global Warming "Science".

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the son of the late Robert F. Kennedy, said, "Get rid of all these rotten politicians that we have in Washington, who are nothing more than corporate toadies." Referring to skeptics of manmade global warming, he said, "This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors."


The most telling sign that someone doesn't understand science is when his argument contains the phrase "All the science supports this". Very few things can be said with certainty. Even fewer have stood the test of time and repeated hypothesis testing.

The issue that sparked this thought process in my head was Sam's declaration that "Science" had won a battle over stem cell funding. Stem cell research MAY yield important, life saving discoveries. I'm not in dispute of that. What I have a problem with is saying that the pursuit of "Science" justifies ignoring the ethical considerations surrounding the topic. Using FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS to pay for research that is ethically questionable to a large percentage of TAX PAYERS is an imposition that boggles my mind. A thought experiment.

If the government started using tax dollars to research the cloning and genetic manipulation of human children, would you be cheering on "Science" and the victory achieved? Let's get a little more raw and a tad ridiculous. If the government was using tax dollars to fund research into the use of pornography to help children cope with the challenges of teenage life, would you be cheering on the research.

To some in the country the idea of using embryos to research stem cell advancement is as reprehensible as handing out pornography at school to minors. I'm not saying that we disallow stem cell research, just that we don't force them to pay for it.

Read more...

Where the &$$# is GOP Leadership??

The mantle of the "Party of Fiscal Responsibility" is out there for the taking. For the past 8 years, the GOP had its chance to show the country how to do it, but even as a Bush foreign policy apologist I have to admit that his track record for government spending betrays a center-left posture at best.

Now, when the current administration would spend, spend, spend, not wanting to waste a good crisis by, you know, not fixing it but spending lots of money anyway, the GOP has every opportunity to talk up the value in conservative ideals and show how those ideals do in fact provide viable solutions not only to the economic crisis but to the problems that President Obama really wants to address (apparently, he doesn't care THAT much about the economic crisis because little of what his administration has come up with does much to solve it, as has been well-documented).

Yes, there are, in fact, conservative solutions to problems of inequality, of health care, of the environment. And instead of beating the pulpit with these, I read that the Republicans in Congress are so cynical about stopping the spending train that they'd rather just get theirs and get on board with what they can.

Way to show how ridiculous the omnibus bill is just on the face by contributing $410 billion in your own earmarks. Stay classy, GOP. Will someone not named Limbaugh or Hanity please stand up and lead?

SCOREBOARD

Dems in Congress: Trillions and counting
GOP in Congress: $410 Billion and counting
Us: I don't even want to imagine

Read more...

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Down with DST

Some things never cease to rile me up, and daylight savings time is one of them. Now that I have a new forum for my views on the issue, I subject you all on what is becoming a twice-yearly tirade against DST.

Once again, Freakonomics is there to tell us how it really is. Thanks to Freakonomics blogger Stephen J. Dubner for finding this article providing good science in support of the notion that Daylight Savings Time is, in fact, a crock and a waste.

It's an interesting premise, but sadly a bit of a boring read unless you're really in to quantitative analysis where the bulk of the writing is just explaining the methodology behind the research; it's important for good science, but painful to read. In a nutshell, these Ph.D. types reminded us all that, contrary to popular belief, Daylight Savings Time isn't about agriculture at all, but it's supposedly about keeping energy costs down by playing with the energy demand.

They did a study of Indiana who until recently left it up to the individual counties to decide whether they would practice DST. What's more, the poor hoosiers have the time zone divide going right down the middle of their state. Anyway, because they recently passed a law that all counties had to practice DST, they have a pretty good natural laboratory to compare average energy consumption.

Our main finding is that—contrary to the policy’s intent—DST results is an overall increase in residential electricity demand. Estimates of the overall increase in consumption are approximately 1 percent and highly statistically significant. We also find that the effect is not constant throughout the DST period: there is some evidence for an increase in electricity demand at the spring transition into DST, but the real increases come in the fall when DST appears to increase consumption between 2 and 4 percent.

On a personal level, I prefer springing forward than falling back, although it comes at the expense of an hours' sleep (and as many showed this Sunday, an embarrassingly late arrival to church). I've never liked the fall time change because I find the abrupt transition to standard time in the fall jarring. It always happens just as the weather's starting to get cooler and the general look of the season a bit more bleak. The sun sits lower in the sky anyway, there are significantly fewer leaves on the trees, it's cold and flu season, etc. My personal favorite is when I arrive at work before the sun's up and don't leave until the sun's down. As a child of summer and something of a sun-worshiper, it's just too much of a change. I'm pretty sure I suffer from seasonal depression anyway and this isn't helping.

So for those of you who may be struggling to find something to get riled up about now that the economy is dominating the news cycle, let's get riled up about this: Down with DST! It has all the components of a great cause: it's easy to put on a bumper sticker, a t-shirt, or a sign to be held up at a rally. You can even apply vague rhetoric to it that sounds profound: "Keep Us Out of the Dark!" "EnLIGHTen America!" What more do you need?

SCOREBOARD

DST as good public policy: 0
Frustrating this humble author to no end twice a year: 100

Read more...

Monday, March 9, 2009

Keeping score of Stem Cell Research

Major breakthrough today for embryonic stem cell research. Just watch the first 2 minutes:



Scoreboard:

Scientific progress and improvement of the human condition: 1 point

Ignorant refusal to fund research based on misguided, hypocritical morality: 0 points

Read more...

Bad Paintings

I have not been bashful in my criticisms of Barack Obama. However I wanted to highlight a website, BadPaintingsOfBarackObama, that I found quite entertaining. I think that regardless of our political differences, we will all agree that these paintings are truly, truly awful.

EDIT: When I originally posted the Mexican themed painting below, I had not noticed the underpants. And now I feel obligated to mention the floating briefs. What could they possibly mean? Is it abstract symbolism? Metaphor for Obama's economic plan? Mexico's desire for America to debrief it on current events? I. Just. Don't. Know. But it is beautiful. And terrible.

A few of my favorites:



Read more...

The Dance

This is one of my favorite television moments of all time, again from the UK Office:

Read more...

Saturday, March 7, 2009

I'm in a British mood these days



Crank up the volume and enjoy a clip from the REAL Office.

Read more...

Friday, March 6, 2009

12 - 1 ... Scoreboard

No more words necessary. Baseball is back baby.

Read more...

The 24 Agenda


I’m a huge 24 fan. I’ve watched every single episode, including the Redemption teaser this year. I can lay claim to watching Season 3 in its entirety in 2 days. That’s right…twenty four 45 minute episodes in 2 days.

Season 7 is turning out to be a winner in my book. The long sabbatical brought about by writer’s strikes and Keifer Sutherland’s personal issues had me waiting in desperation to see Jack yell “Get Down!!!” half a dozen times per episode and unconventionally torture a few terrorists.

Which brings me to my point. Has anyone noticed the glaring agenda this season? I realize that the majority of the seasons have smelled of a political agenda, but this season reeks of several. A few I’ve noticed:

1. The President is a woman. We’ve seen President Taylor show incredible spine in the face of adversity, but she’s displayed some emotional weakness in recent episodes. She practically broke down and checked herself out of commission at the news of her husband’s non-fatal shooting. I recall a couple Hillary breakdowns. Several questions were raised about the woman's ability to handle the emotional strain of being president. Spare me comments in defense of Hillary Clinton please. I'm just saying.

2. Guantanamo-style interrogations tactics. This isn’t new to 24. How many times have we seen Jack tear an electrical cord apart for a little terrorist shock therapy? He does what’s “necessary” right? This season we seem to have both sides of the debate represented, which is new to 24. Larry Moss and Senator Mayor are both out to bring Jack down for his history of questionable interrogation tactics. In this week’s episode Jack was stopped in the middle of an interrogation in which he was on the verge of extracting vital information on a potential terror target. President Taylor stopped the interrogation. Turns out she was the target. Woops. So now the elephant in the room is the question of whether Jack should have been left alone to extract the vital info, despite his use of less conventional tactics. He was using a taser, in case you missed it. No water boarding…yet.

3. The U.S. is occupying Sangala, Africa, a country that is in the middle of establishing a democratic government while being thwarted by an evil totalitarian regime. The U.S. has offered military help to Sangala, which has brought upon the U.S. a string of terrorist attacks planned by the hostile Sangalan regime. Iraq! (cough).

By no means is this surprising, as political agendas run through the fiber of our daily dose of media and late night TV. But for 24 I find this season a bit bloated with political gas. But I must say that I love this season!

Read more...

Being Constructive

Lest I be accused of just raining down bad news and fear, here is how I see this thing getting turned around.

Obama gives another one of his "I screwed up" speeches" and says he has been too ambitious and focused on too many things.

From here on out he will wake up each day working to end this financial/economic crisis facing the country and once we are out of it look to attack other problems. The model to follow here is Clemenceau from WWI. Also a liberal left wing that rose to power in WWI in France amid crisis. (Next quote is taken from World Undone, an amazing book I'm reading right now about WWI)

"Clemenceau embraced the elites--the bankers, the manufacturers, the leaders of the haute bourgeoisie-that he had reviled all his life. Talk of limiting or confiscating excess war profits was extinguished as completely as talk of a compromise peace. The moneyed classes could help to win the war, and therefore they were Clemenceau's friends. Anyone expressing doubt was his enemy.
Making decisions was easy in the Clemenceau government. Whatever could contribute to victory was done. Whatever might make victory more difficult was, whenever possible, stamped out. Anything irrelevant to the war no longer mattered.
'Home policy?' Clemenceau declared when questioned about his plans. 'I wage war! Foreign policy? I wage war!'"

Clemenceau was not a hawk, he vigorously opposed war and sought for peace up until he became the French premier in 1917. He recognized that none of his socialist ideas could be put into place until AFTER the crisis was passed. If Obama takes this approach watch the stock market shoot up and with that a lot of other related components following. Can he swallow his pride and take this step? Lincoln would have done it.

Read more...

Thursday, March 5, 2009

First to go: GM

Well, it’s inevitable at this point: GM is going down. But does this really come as a surprise to anyone? Last November when Chrysler and GM were on their knees begging for government aid to avoid taking their last deep, dying breath we all knew better. We tossed several posts around on this blog last November and I’d like to quote one of our authors:

“Look, this bailout money will be churned and burned in no time and we will see this same scenario again sometime in 2009--especially by GM and Chrysler.”

OK, so I said that. To date, GM has received $13.4B from Uncle Sam and has applied for $16.6B on top of that. Now, GM is staring down the barrel at a $1B bond that is coming due June 1. Without adequate capital to satisfy debt covenants, the company will default, which in turn could detonate a string of other loan covenant defaults.

Bankruptcy is inevitable at this point, and in my opinion is the better option. Yes, the loss of jobs is a sad side effect of such a move. In addition the ripple effect throughout the economy from the fall of such a behemoth will certainly not bode well. But that’s the deck of cards we’re left to play with.

In a previous post I left a link to a proposed solution by two University of Chicago Economists who favor a pre-packaged bankruptcy over a Chapter 11. It’s an interesting read, especially in light of the fact that GM is now in a final tail spin. I leave the link once again here.

Read more...

Cramer says something similar

Great read

I know you're going to accuse Cramer of being a right wing, hedge fund fat cat but he also says this in his article today:

To be totally out of the closet, I actually embrace every part of Obama's agenda, right down to the increase on personal taxes and the mortgage deduction. I am a fierce environmentalist who has donated multiple acres to the state of New Jersey to keep forever wild. I believe in cap and trade. I favor playing hardball with drug companies that hold up the U.S. government with me-too products.

But these are issues that we have no time for now, on the verge of a second Great Depression. This is an agenda that must be held back for better times. It is an agenda that at this moment is radical vs. what is called for. I am proud to have voted for the Obama who I thought understood the need to get us on the right path, and create jobs and wealth before taxing it and making moves that hurt job creation -- certainly ones that will outweigh the meager number of jobs he's creating.

Read more...

Why I don't care about animals today


Many of you are probably noting the drop in the stock market recently. I thought I'd post what the implications of the past 2 months' events have for the future. This is of course just one analysis, but it is something that is not nearly as far-fetched sounding as it would have been last year.

Just so you have a short list of what's at stake if Washington DC doesn't change policy here and now (which means before the collapse in equities comes, which could start as soon as today, if the indicators I watch have any validity at all. For what its worth, those indicators are painting a picture of the Apocalypse that I simply can't believe, and they're showing it as an imminent event - like perhaps today imminent.)

* All pension funds, private and public, are done. If you are receiving one, you won't be. If you think you will in the future, you won't be. PBGC will fail as well. Pension funds will be forced to start eating their "seed corn" within the next 12 months and once that begins there is no way to recover.
* All annuities will be defaulted to the state insurance protection (if any) on them. The state insurance funds will be bankrupted and unable to be replenished. Essentially, all annuities are toast. Expect zero, be ecstatic if you do better. All insurance companies with material exposure to these obligations will go bankrupt, without exception. Some of these firms are dangerously close to this happening right here and now; the rest will die within the next 6-12 months. If you have other insured interests with these firms, be prepared to pay a LOT more with a new company that can't earn anything off investments, and if you have a claim in process at the time it happens, it won't get paid. The probability of you getting "boned" on any transaction with an insurance company is extremely high - I rate this risk in excess of 90%.
* The FDIC will be unable to cover bank failure obligations. They will attempt to do more of what they're doing now (raising insurance rates and doing special assessments) but will fail; the current path has no chance of success. Congress will backstop them (because they must lest shotguns come out) with disastrous results. In short, FDIC backstops will take precedence even over Social Security and Medicare.
* Government debt costs will ramp. This warning has already been issued and is being ignored by President Obama. When (not if) it happens debt-based Federal Funding will disappear. This leads to....
* Tax receipts are cratering and will continue to. I expect total tax receipts to fall to under $1 trillion within the next 12 months. Combined with the impossibility of continued debt issue (rollover will only remain possible at the short duration Treasury has committed to over the last ten years if they cease new issue) a 66% cut in the Federal Budget will become necessary. This will require a complete repudiation of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, a 50% cut in the military budget and a 50% across-the-board cut in all other federal programs. That will likely get close.
* Tax-deferred accounts will be seized to fund rollovers of Treasury debt at essentially zero coupon (interest). If you have a 401k, or what's left of it, or an IRA, consider it locked up in Treasuries; it's not yours any more. Count on this happening - it is essentially a certainty.
* Any firm with debt outstanding is currently presumed dead as the street presumption is that they have lied in some way. Expect at least 20% of the S&P 500 to fail within 12 months as a consequence of the complete and total lockup of all credit markets which The Fed will be unable to unlock or backstop. This will in turn lead to....
* The unemployed will have 5-10 million in direct layoffs added within the next 12 months. Collateral damage (suppliers, customers, etc) will add at least another 5-10 million workers to that, perhaps double that many. U-3 (official unemployment rate) will go beyond 15%, U-6 (broad form) will reach 30%.
* Civil unrest will break out before the end of the year. The Military and Guard will be called up to try to stop it. They won't be able to. Big cities are at risk of becoming a free-fire death zone. If you live in one, figure out how you can get out and live somewhere else if you detect signs that yours is starting to go "feral"; witness New Orleans after Katrina for how fast, and how bad, it can get.


How important do those bald eagles sound now? How about global warming and universal health care (which we can't possibly pay for)?

Read more...

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Science is for the birds

The thing I'll miss most about the former administration is that back then, crap got done. Didn't matter how. Crap got done.

We went by our guts back then. No science or data required. Just go with it. This is a minor issue in the face of a battered economy and ongoing wars but times have been tough for the bald eagles, too.

I'm really going to miss this mentality:

Apparently, Bush signed a mid-night order in December that un-required endangered species to undergo a scientific review before going on or off the list.

Wow.

Fortunately, Obama is plowing through his "ridiculous-executive-orders-to-reverse" pile and caught this one.

Read more...

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

WW II Explained

Ok wow.

Click this link and follow the story, left to right. You'll have to click on the picture itself to zoom in. You will not be disappointed. In fact I will be using this to teach all my children about WWII. This and Band of Brothers.

Read more...

Hang on to our Last Real Friend in Europe

I was disappointed that a prominent British newspaper ran the following headline to this story: "Downing Street left embarrassed after President Obama scales down first meeting with Brown." (For those of you who don't speak British, "Downing Street" is to the UK what "the White House" is to the US.)

Though I disagree with the method of its application, I can certainly understand and appreciate President Obama's desire to reach out in a new way to those who have a traditional antagonism towards our country. However, I find it dangerous to not maintain traditionally supportive relationships with other countries at the highest level possible.

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown issued this op-ed piece to a prominent British news service in which he said the following:

"[T]here is no international partnership in recent history that has served the world better than the special relationship between Britain and the United States.

"It is a relationship that has endured and flourished because it is based not simply on our shared history but on the enduring values that bind us together – our countries founded upon liberty, our histories forged through democracy and an unshakeable belief in the power of enterprise and opportunity."

The Prime Minister visited Washington hoping to work with the new face of a long-standing friend towards shared economic goals, hoping to have their spouses meet and become friends, and inject a bit of optimism into a dreary news cycle for both countries.

Instead, "Mr Brown's aides are trying to make the best of what is a distinctly low key visit compared to the family hospitality lavished on Tony Blair by George Bush when they met for the first time."

I'm continually disappointed in the lack of appreciation for our allies that the Dems have shown since they first put on a good show of outrage at Dubya's spurning of much of Europe in going to Iraq (debate for another day). In 2004, Senator Kerry continually attacked how weak the Iraq Coalition was, to which Dubya casually responded, 'You don't win new allies by besmirching the efforts of those you already have,' (paraphrasing).

The US needs to reach out to recent enemies and attempt to warm cooling friendships. But the US needs also to nurture the friendships it has, lest our attempts to forge new ones come at the expense of older, more valuable ones. The UK has been a friend at the expense of its leaders' own popular opinion. I think that means something and I worry that the President snubbed the Prime Minister.

Read more...

Of Prosperity and Freedom

One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary.


It was in 1975 that Ayn Rand wrote those words. And yet, they could have been written today. They could have been a response to President Obama’s recent address to Congress. Her words succinctly describe the liberal battle plan in Obama’s war on prosperity.

For how else can his actions be described? Am I misinterpreting his massive tax increases, his cap and trade fantasy, his universal health care disaster, his disdain for executives, his resentment for wealth, and his over-reaching philosophy about the role of government? Am I wrong to believe that President Obama and the liberal leaders of Congress are not unabashed statists? And am I wrong in thinking that statism (and socialism) is a destructive, damning, quasi-religious faith in government to solve our problems, to lift us out of the dark and to watch over each of us, benevolently guiding us along that sacred Third Way?

(Incidentally, I find it ironic that so many on the political left despise organized religion. Decrying it as oppressive and controlling, despite the fact that obedience to a religious creed is voluntary. But seem to have little problem with the government forcing certain behaviors upon its people through laws, orders and lectures.)

If I am wrong about Obama, then what are his politics? If he is no statist, and no socialist, then who is this man? If he is not waging a war on prosperity, then how should I interpret his assault on the free market?

Obama said:

I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the assistance they receive, and this time, they will have to clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending for the American taxpayer. This time, CEOs won't be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks or buy fancy drapes or disappear on a private jet. Those days are over.


The obvious question is whether or not that standard applies to Nancy Pelosi and her tax-payer funded private jet or to Obama’s fleet of 28 (at $400M each) new helicopters? Probably not. But the overall theme of the statement demonstrates a gross misunderstanding of the role of government in the American political system.

The writers of the Constitution crafted the document for the sole purpose of protecting individual freedoms through limiting the influence and power of the government. For a president to lecture the American people about holding the private sector accountable is both inappropriate as well as unconstitutional. And the fact that the president doing so has never at any time in his life worked in the private sector is thick irony.

But when has it ever been the duty of the president to create any job? When has it been the job of the president to reward or punish CEOs?

I will not spend a single penny for the purpose of rewarding a single Wall Street executive, but I will do whatever it takes to help the small business that can't pay its workers or the family that has saved and still can't get a mortgage.


I find it alarming that Obama wants to help people who have “saved and still can’t get a mortgage.” Why? What is wrong with that family saving for a little longer, or putting away a little more money each month? Why does Barack Obama feel the need to intervene (with my tax dollars) where patience, restraint, and personal responsibility have governed American consumers for two centuries?

In an absurd declaration, Obama said he wants to cut the deficit in half before 2012, all while still spending trillions of dollars on housing, education, and health care entitlement programs that will destroy incentive, raise taxes, discourage entrepreneurship, weaken our national defense and handcuff industry and innovation--a mathematical impossibility. In other words: a war on prosperity.

Why does the political left despise capitalism? Why is it that the only successful economic system in the history of the world raises such rancor among the progressives of our culture? What is so immoral about prosperity? What is so detestable about wealth? And why is the existence of failure so unacceptable? Failure breeds innovation. Innovation leads to solutions. And solutions bring about success.

Ayn Rand, again:

Capitalism demands the best of every man – his rationality – and rewards him accordingly. It leaves every man free to choose the work he likes, to specialize in it, to trade his product for the products of others, and to go as far on the road of achievement as his ability and ambition will carry him.


The media outlets liked to say that Obama’s recent speech was “Reagan-esque”. I can’t help but think that Reagan, on a horse in some eternal field, must be laughing mildly at that claim. But he must also feel a sense of sadness, of loss. Because Obama is no Reagan. And those individual liberties that Reagan fought so hard for are not values championed by Barack Obama. Reagan said in 1976:

Profit is a dirty word, blamed for most of our social ills. In the interest of something called "consumerism," free enterprise is becoming far less free. Property rights are being reduced and even eliminated in the name of environmental protection. It is time that a voice be raised on behalf of the [private sector], pointing out that profit, property rights, and freedom are inseparable and you cannot have the third unless you continue to be entitled to have the first two.


Not until President Obama starts to understand and fight for that, will he ever be anything like Reagan, who asked:

Will we, before it is too late, use the vitality and the magic of the marketplace to save this way of life, or will we one day face our children, and our children's children when they ask us where we were and what we were doing on the day that freedom was lost?

Read more...

Monday, March 2, 2009

BCW



BCW.

As in, "Bathroom Can Wait."

This came up on the Dan Patrick Show last week in the context of watching sports. You know the feeling when you gotta go to the bathroom, but when so-and-so is playing...the bathroom can wait? Well, that guy is BCW.

LeBron James is definitely BCW. In fact I would say he is Mr. BCW, or "King" BCW, if you will. (sidenote: I hate that he's nicknamed King James, but what're ya gonna do?)

So who is BCW in the world of sports in 2009?

Here's my list:

College Hoops: Davidson's Stephen Curry. He is a man unto himself in college basketball. Nobody is as BCW as him. In fact, for me, there's nobody else who is BCW in college ball right now. Maybe Blake Griffin. Maybe.

Golf: Only one. The Tiger Woods. Well, and Michelle Wie. Sike.

MLB: There are several BCWs in baseball. Manny Ramirez and Alex Rodriguez are absolutely BCW. The former because he is the purest hitter of my lifetime. The latter because he is the biggest trainwreck in baseball. Other baseball BCWs: Tim Lincecum, Jonathan Papelbon, Johan Santana, and Ichiro Suzuki (when you factor in hitting and fielding, the dude is a must-watch). Sorry Pujols, not BCW. Sorry Rivera, not anymore.

NFL: Quarterbacks Tom Brady and Peyton Manning are totally BCW. From there the pickins are slim, but I contend that Larry Fitzgerald, Adrian Peterson, and Ed Reed are 100% BCW. If you saw Larry and Ed in the playoffs this past January, you'd agree. BCW.

NBA: LeBron James. Period. Other BCWs in the NBA are as follows: Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade, and Kevin Durant (even though he plays for the team that shall not be named, he is un-freaking-real and I'm a fan). Apologies to Dwight Howard and Nate Robinson -- you're close. Regrets to Shaq and AI, you both used to be.

We're entering a fabulous time of year. March Madness, Opening Day, The Masters, NFL Draft, NBA Playoffs.

I say it's all BCW.

My wife rolls her eyes.

Read more...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP